
I don't know if it's just me that thinks it's wrong, but shouldn't the comma here be an "and" or at least an "&", if nothing else? It seems to be generally accepted to place a comma (at least in newspapers) instead of the word "and". However, it does lead to some confusion, as at first glance the headline doesn't make sense. You have to you read it two or three times, or just start reading the article, then you realise what the headline is actually referring to. This isn't just a parochial newspaper issue - I've seen it in "The Australian" too.
I asked a journalist I was sailing with what the reasoning was. Space - that's it. Because they can't squeeze the word "and" in, they just put a comma. These editors, these people who (should have) studied English for four years at university, should know better. As if people's spelling isn't bad enough already. If anyone can explain to me how this makes grammatical sense, I would love to know!